From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Jul 6 14:22:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (dhcp44-21.dis.org [216.240.44.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0264437B403; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:22:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f66LZja01616; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:35:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200107062135.f66LZja01616@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Arun Sharma Cc: Peter Pentchev , arch@FreeBSD.org, hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New hw.cpuhz sysctl as per PR i386/27627 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Jul 2001 11:11:00 PDT." <20010706111100.A10405@sharmas.dhs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 14:35:45 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Does this sysctl adjust itself on machines with Intel SpeedStep > technology ? Based on my web searches, the MSRs which contain that > info don't seem to be documented. I've read about efforts to reverse > engineer the windows utility PRCPU.EXE, but haven't seen any results. This will come with the ACPI processor support; a little further down my list. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message