Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 21:24:11 -0600 From: LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dependancies and the ports that depend on them Message-ID: <25ACC3A6-FA55-4474-B96F-0B513E2606AD@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <tkrat.61cf082ca0486933@FreeBSD.org> References: <C12CE8B2-9F81-4BBF-A155-AC9435BF6BED@kreme.com> <CAP7rwcg%2BOmA1W4E5a_%2BY2%2BQZ9oRsPMuL4%2BdnT%2BAaoOFi4voeWQ@mail.gmail.com> <C1450A69-6A33-4F6D-908E-32B70494D886@kreme.com> <tkrat.61cf082ca0486933@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sep 22, 2018, at 16:55, Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 >> On 22 Sep, @lbutlr wrote: >>> On 22 Sep 2018, at 07:06, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> wrote: >>> You might give pkg_tree (ports-mgmt/pkg_tree) a try. It won't answer >>> the question specifically, but it'll show you how libX11 is being >>> brought into apache24. >>=20 >> That's worked perfectly, and I would NEVER have found it, because libx11 w= as under openjdk which was under ... db5. >>=20 >> Wow. DB5. Would never have thought of checking that. >=20 > That's not the default. The db5 JAVA option defaults off. That is seriously odd. There is ZERO chance I would ever enable Java, I have= n=E2=80=99t used Java in 15 years, and that was under protest and not on my o= wn hardware. --=20 My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways t= o reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25ACC3A6-FA55-4474-B96F-0B513E2606AD>