From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 10 09:33:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B34416A4BF
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp03.web.de [217.72.192.158])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FA743F85
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:33:36 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from nakal@web.de)
Received: from [217.81.255.75] (helo=[192.168.0.1])
	by smtp.web.de with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(WEB.DE 4.99 #448)
	id 19x7uQ-000403-00; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:33:34 +0200
From: Martin <nakal@web.de>
To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <3F5F2774.9010408@gmx.net>
References: <3F5F2774.9010408@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1063211606.593.46.camel@klotz.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:33:26 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: nakal@web.de
cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Quo vadis, -CURRENT? (recent changes to cc & compatibility)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:33:37 -0000

Am Mi, 2003-09-10 um 15.30 schrieb Michael Nottebrock:
> Sorry if this sounds a bit flame-ish, but the way I see it we now have a
> system compiler in -CURRENT that doesn't even compile a hello world if
> -pedantic is specified and breaks with lots of existing software out there

Yes. I agree on this. I would also like to have a compiler which 
compiles with strictest warning settings possible, because I'm
developing on several platforms at once.

But I like gcc-3.x (for my C++ programs) very much and would like to
continue programming with this compiler, even it does not compile
hello world with -pedantic.

Wouldn't it be better to complain in a gcc mailing list? You know
exactly that FreeBSD-current is offering the most recent technologies
and _this_ is why I like it.

Martin