From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 8 14:13:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD41B16A4E5 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5B843D49 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:13:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 5032 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 14:13:22 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Nov 2006 14:13:22 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CFE4528432; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:13:21 -0500 (EST) To: ke han References: <42BF2ECA-634A-4FC2-B620-4319A3DF54CA@redstarling.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:13:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <42BF2ECA-634A-4FC2-B620-4319A3DF54CA@redstarling.com> (ke han's message of "Tue, 7 Nov 2006 03:58:51 +0800") Message-ID: <44ejse6n7i.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Questions list Subject: Re: 6.2 beta 3 debug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:13:25 -0000 ke han writes: > I recall that when either 6.0 or 6.1 was in beta that the iso was > delivered with debugging on which made it a bit slower. > Is 6.2 beta 3 delivered with debugging or production compile options? It should be exactly what we expect to "ship".