Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:32:04 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn-export Re: svn bdb checkout? Message-ID: <20130120153204.GB14521@external.screwed.box> In-Reply-To: <20130118235017.545509b5@archlinux.ca> References: <50F6FD37.5060309@gmail.com> <20130116193534.GC8524@external.screwed.box> <50F704CE.3010904@gmail.com> <20130116200754.GD8524@external.screwed.box> <50F70C60.4000108@FreeBSD.org> <20130116205533.GE8524@external.screwed.box> <20130117045431.GB5392@external.screwed.box> <20130118032508.445fa43b@archlinux.ca> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301172115090.92296@wonkity.com> <20130118235017.545509b5@archlinux.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello. 2013/01/18 23:50:17 +0000 Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> => To Warren Block : X> On 2013-01-17 21:32 -0700 X> Warren Block wrote: X> X> >A working version in any language would be great. A better version in X> >Python would be nice, too, but it's the working part that's important. X> X> There's a difference between "working" and "working on a random system with X> unexpectedly disabled features". The current version works in the former sense. I suppose the latter is what the perl5 in general and cpan (cpan-testers at the least) was always considered to be about. I'd disclose that following TIMTOWTDI the so called 'modern perl' and a 'perl6' can be used to reconsider on this. For the case of following the former line the switch to python may (or may not) happen to be the (good) difference about such a freebsd-related task. Will see. Thank you. -- Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org> (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: 1754B9C1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130120153204.GB14521>