From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 7 8:44:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177CE37B41B for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:44:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id EFA79AE22C; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:44:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:44:24 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Zhihui Zhang Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A question of VM page ownership Message-ID: <20020307164424.GF26621@elvis.mu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Zhihui Zhang [020307 08:28] wrote: > > Is there any fundamental reason why a page can not be owned by more than > one VM object? If that was the case, the bogus page stuff in vfs_bio.c > could be made cleaner IMHO. There is only enough linkage in the vm page to support it being associated with one object. see src/sys/vm/vm_page.h -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message