From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 14:30:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E00F3EE; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6051E7F; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8836D02; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 36E40AEAB; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:29:59 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Fabian Keil Subject: Re: svn commit: r246362 - head/games/fortune/datfiles References: <201302051439.r15EdcE7011203@svn.freebsd.org> <201302051145.40104.jhb@freebsd.org> <20130206021818.GB2899@eureka.lemis.com> <20130206115347.00720818@fabiankeil.de> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:29:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130206115347.00720818@fabiankeil.de> (Fabian Keil's message of "Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:53:47 +0100") Message-ID: <86halph5w9.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, John Baldwin X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:30:06 -0000 Fabian Keil writes: > I'm somewhat amused that Limbaugh quotes are apparently considered > too offensive for fortunes-o.real, while the Hitler quotes from > games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes don't even qualify for fotunes-o. That was, believe it or not, the result of a lengthy discussion in which it was concluded that the Hitler quotes were appropriate because they were intended to ridicule his views. I don't necessarily agree with that line of reasoning, but the difference here is that while Hitler is relatively ancient history, Limbaugh is very much part of the current political landscape and were added by someone who espouses his views, which in my mind makes them political propaganda. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no