Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:58:10 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: ml-freebsd-stable Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HPN-SSH question Message-ID: <1196DEC9-2AEE-4F9A-8521-EFA8513D6003@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <40A76FC1992140AFA5B8EB52C28DB3A1@multiplay.co.uk> References: <9728B37F7A4EBE45A2FD4B18883BAED6D02612@SN2PRD0802MB111.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <BE96C8EC5CEB4411BAA45D9A5882CDAB@multiplay.co.uk> <A6AFCC97-74FE-4B9E-8B9E-B245909D944E@lists.zabbadoz.net> <40A76FC1992140AFA5B8EB52C28DB3A1@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote: > Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experienced noticeably > reduced transfer rates on high latency links, exactly the opposite > as one would expect. I don't have the exact figures I'm afraid as > we just went straight back to standard ssh. > > I'll try and get some time to retest and provide some proper > results. Thanks. If you do please try the bundled version in 8-STABLE or 9 and also gather the usual meta data (latency, packet loss, IPv4/v6, any socket buffer tuning, ...). /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1196DEC9-2AEE-4F9A-8521-EFA8513D6003>