From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 25 01:43:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A0D1065670 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spsneo@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7B68FC0A for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spsneo@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 31so1078864yxl.13 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:43:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WNMSy+Ux+7+d35kv4s3qRoO2GIZreV37pdcf/ApTRsg=; b=AcJOQcLlKu1ZHJb8dZ1mLldsO7bU7BKWneWetaVjTBVPHSsPDCh0bwgy9fp+SnSOWz MUz0uKLK6GHk+RQidW2jTN+F/GsFlJeEHFs0mOvKsq+sGle/rklMn5+RHf6Z+gYfYh6Z AIwKvMiTVI+Z1D8VQIwx27lGmLd1BAZWf6Gvw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O9KHZkZxLWmXaFTNWnRt0YjUMDF1khTBNG5XL9POR1rfWrL/f0X0tc7QqfueH+F2Bc xAYCotiWBPo4NY4Pt4jkiNF7gesQP0bw9x/kYZ+roIz2IoqV/ttAQTE+QsA2WmhkOVx1 xsR0Y2yTBl1U5erBPwhnC0OzxWxzezhVsJpD0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.8.5 with SMTP id 5mr8726427tih.44.1235526185419; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:43:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49A457CA.20704@dir.bg> References: <1aa142960902241100u671d5f90u769ad98e08fabb43@mail.gmail.com> <49A447C5.2020903@freebsd.org> <49A457CA.20704@dir.bg> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:13:05 +0530 Message-ID: From: Siddharth Prakash Singh To: Jordan Gordeev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Google SoC 2009 Idea X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:43:07 -0000 Yeah I sent the same proposal to all the *BSD mailing list, because I am interested in doing this project . What's wrong in proposing the same project in all the *BSD organizations? On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Jordan Gordeev wrote: > Sam Leffler wrote: >> >> Siddharth Prakash Singh wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler. >>>>> I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD. >>>>> Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore >>>>> Architectures. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Talk to jeff@freebsd.org, the author of ULE. >>>> >>> >>> What are your opinions on this project? What is the scope of this >>> project? >>> >>>>> >>>>> Linux Kernel 2.6.* currently supports SMP, SMT, NUMA architectures. >>>>> >>> >>> Does the current scheduler has support for "CPU affinity/binding", >>> mechanism for distinguishing varying capability of CPUs. >>> >>>> >>>> These may be there already in ULE, although I'm not sure about NUMA. >>>> >>>> Ray >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Waiting for your response, >>> >>> >> >> I note you sent this same note to the netbsd mailing lists. =A0You might >> want to do some more investigation before you propose a project. >> >> =A0 Sam >> > It was also sent to the DragonFly mailing lists. :-) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > --=20 Siddharth Prakash Singh http://www.spsneo.com