From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 01:30:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F201516A4CF; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:30:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BE143D48; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:30:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7C1T9TH025988; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:29:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i7C1T9c1025987; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:29:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:29:09 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20040812012909.GA25768@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20040811171300.N54010@ync.qbhto.arg> <8576C147-EBF7-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8576C147-EBF7-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Doug Barton cc: re@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Alfred Perlstein cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Ceri Davies Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add Makefile add.h extract.c futil.c main.c perform.c pkg_add.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create Makefile create.h main.c perform.c pkg_create.1 pl.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete Makefile delete.h main.c perform.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:30:42 -0000 nOn Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:35:33AM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Before I get a million replies to this commit: When anyone from re@ > thinks it is worth the effort, I will add an -c option to the C > pkg_version code ASAP. I believe backing this out won't be beneficial > for -STABLE users, since they'll loose a lot of features (and speed). > Has anyone on this thread *ever* used that option? I would like to see the -c added please. I know it seems like busywork but we have historically tried to make sure existing semantics don't change in -stable without a really really really good reason. Additional features (and speed ;-) are always welcome/good as long as existing semantics don't change. If you need any help or want to discuss it let me know. Thanks. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |