From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 17 12:29:40 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1A61065673;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:29:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0248FC14;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:29:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net
	[66.111.2.69])
	by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52A9846B8E;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:29:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from jhbbsd.hudson-trading.com (unknown [209.249.190.8])
	by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6477E8A072;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:29:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:13:34 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <20090602222445.2F6017302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
	<Rj7Fi0Uz71tB6gaY5wX5iV4Wqak@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4>
	<k+9khAZnafPFfFU0wKmc9RlPP/Y@j4OYE6OL8eALCd4BvSxIfwgoxSc>
In-Reply-To: <k+9khAZnafPFfFU0wKmc9RlPP/Y@j4OYE6OL8eALCd4BvSxIfwgoxSc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200906170813.34660.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1
	(bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:29:39 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE
	autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, kmacy@freebsd.org,
	Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:29:41 -0000

On Wednesday 17 June 2009 12:26:27 am Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> John, good day.
> 
> Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:29:56AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:02:25AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 11:26:17 pm Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > > > Yes, seems like so.  John, may be we can eliminate the only reference 
to
> > > > KTR_PERCPU from sys/sys/pcpu.h?  Both 'struct pcpu' fields seem to be
> > > > unused (grep'ped -CURRENT sources).
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > 
> > Fine.  Then the attached patch should remove the stuff.
> 
> Could the mentioned KTR_PERCPU stuff be removed or you think that
> it is better to leave it "as is"?

I removed it from HEAD already after your previous e-mail (at least from 
<sys/pcpu.h>).  Was there something else you had in mind?

-- 
John Baldwin