From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 14:26:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 216A03D0 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B99A1AE9 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id x13so4735153wgg.9 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:26:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PgUMERt1NHsPGTbJb36axbXOdXreXZ3cROZh14XX2Eg=; b=DMPQmmH5ZwFw5F+osQB20Lg4Gr5yovGBDd6H9QVKiSQrYBdRkyKVNHJDrtaPyED8rY tNW4blR+F2BU+pY0ax9N396Mp43lQjxjjdCl17k1zUUtFOVBXwnMMAMS8/x1+vVojCWf 8Lgtz1WeusenJzVKUMWPLETOxLXJXvRYnCRld3bW/0GFFzMdSTTkPnVLTLnANBrAYkTc 078Pp9wKbsA9dvDbaaBk45uX5kp70nzQFinmpOadsnGkT+hp613r88N/sN6UbKaNypNV Nd+mH2u2jj0ITxf9Tz0n1f9mOH0Sb6eW4l9onipqJs9hkx1rxRTbF+h/HtBWmfR7akrx 9o4Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.7.227 with SMTP id m3mr8907556wia.59.1390746398105; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:26:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.1.71 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:26:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52E0C1D4.9000304@freebsd.org> <52E0D1BB.2050807@callfortesting.org> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:26:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux on BHyVe in 10.0-RELEASE From: Markiyan Kushnir To: Aryeh Friedman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:26:40 -0000 yes, once I posted it I realized that these sysctls are not relevant at this stage. There was a segfault, was that bhyvectl? May be it makes sense for someone (a bhyve dev) to inspect it? -- Markiyan. 2014-01-26 Aryeh Friedman : > > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Markiyan Kushnir > wrote: >> >> hmm... >> >> 15:45:test-bhyve# md5 ubuntu-12.04.3-server-amd64.iso >> MD5 (ubuntu-12.04.3-server-amd64.iso) = 2cbe868812a871242cdcdd8f2fd6feb9 > > > # md5 ubuntu/ubuntu.iso > MD5 (ubuntu/ubuntu.iso) = 2cbe868812a871242cdcdd8f2fd6feb9 > > doing the sysctl does no good > > -- > Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org