From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 10 00:46:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475D316A40F for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [217.160.200.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071E213C467 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C785CDE; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at claire.ber.rewt.org.uk Received: from claire.ber.rewt.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (claire.ber.rewt.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2FNKfTSURPGW; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [195.28.169.201] (jwh.lon.rewt.org.uk [195.28.169.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by claire.ber.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61B65C62; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:41 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45A432F9.6000703@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:37 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (Windows/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <45a4003a.a9.79e0.1327045836@cytanet.com.cy> <45A40C9A.10700@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:46:03 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Note that things are different when upgrading from one major version to > another (e.g. 6.x to 7.x), though I even managed to update 5.x to 6.x > while the machine was "live" the whole time with only minor glitches, > solved by recompiling ports. I doubt this would work with 6.x->7.x > because of the many changes. > I'd just like to add for future reference, that upgrading to 7.x from 6.x is possible, only problems I personally encountered was the above problems with ports needing to be recompiled, which is to be expected anyway. Ta, Joe