From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 19 13:01:07 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845C516A41F;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:01:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com)
Received: from www.portaone.com (support.portaone.com [195.70.151.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF30D43D46;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:01:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com)
Received: from [192.168.0.49] (lesnik.portaone.com [195.140.246.50] (may be
	forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
	by www.portaone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7JD0hEF095867
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:00:44 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com)
Message-ID: <4305D7FA.2070900@portaone.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:00:42 +0300
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com>
Organization: Porta Software Ltd
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
References: <20050819015327.GA7627@crodrigues.org>
	<86fyt6gyds.fsf@xps.des.no>	<20050819120309.GA10568@crodrigues.org>
	<86vf22dswg.fsf@xps.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86vf22dswg.fsf@xps.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2,
	clamav-milter version 0.86 on www.portaone.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=ham version=3.0.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on www.portaone.com
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: XFS for FreeBSD, new snapshot available
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Maxim.Sobolev@portaone.com
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:01:07 -0000

Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> writes:
> 
>>On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
>>
>>>Any particular reason why you don't simply commit it?
>>
>>We're not ready yet.  We need to go through more testing, more
>>feedback from users, and add more functionality (write support).
> 
> 
> You'll get more feedback if the code is in the tree, and there is
> precedent for committing filessystems without write support.

Seconded. Having it in the tree will warrant that much more eyes will be 
looking on it, both from the user's PoV and from developer's PoV.

-Maxim