From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 1 19:48:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E922116A402 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 19:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pneumann@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F5113C480 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 19:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pneumann@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so2024572wxc for ; Tue, 01 May 2007 12:48:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=FLSsG4ZPhTP9A3pASVieOFzIFiG0dQxX7i6WOTjV9LPWMpRQXOSKG+7RvCavtDQvrgp6LrATKyxhgY1bMKHmI9fjqvdoCNhfogD/vtxhPexPXFX1pIsWBa6OPFNmliv3YG1msRYj/zozqBBugOfri3DWcKUP7Ge8WSwpTjgFNqQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=hD02PdvAV9q/cw3N2LJcIZgyf/ro1RVI3Zc6lu/pITOXFX2tvcC6HHAgGOAvkHNL2Ij3XNiGYjyYcrajTlpYVE7Mo14PNaPLqujC6pBikAALID1LTZnTgl6zEPmBSoacRF1iz4hcTOjITD1T0YXkWsJRiQ1KM8P1RSfUYb2uXX4= Received: by 10.90.49.19 with SMTP id w19mr6444934agw.1178047189096; Tue, 01 May 2007 12:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.124? ( [201.215.221.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q57sm11920670wrq.2007.05.01.12.19.47; Tue, 01 May 2007 12:19:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Phillip N." To: Daniel Eischen In-Reply-To: References: <46335268.2030701@helenmarks.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 12:19:44 -0400 Message-Id: <1178036384.1277.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 May 2007 20:07:31 +0000 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Dominic Marks Subject: Re: Mono XSP & mod_mono support on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 19:48:27 -0000 El sáb, 28-04-2007 a las 10:55 -0400, Daniel Eischen escribió: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Dominic Marks wrote: > > > Hackers, > > > > Currently XSP (Mono's ASP.NET implementation) does not run on FreeBSD. > > > > There is a brief post here about the reasons why from David Xu: > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads/2005-March/002944.html > > > > Since that message is over 2 years old I hoped that it might no longer be the > > case, but when I attempted to run the application it does not work. This is > > the case if you use libc_r, libthr or libpthread. I was using 6.2-STABLE, if > > it matters. > > > > I am interested if anyone knows if this is likely to ever work. I am more > > than happy to test patches for anyone who wanted to have a go at it. It seems > > that there was a previous effort to get it ported but that seems to have run > > to this issue and stopped. > > Process shared mutexes and condition variables will never be supported > in 6.x. They may occur at some point in 7.x. mono should be fixed so > that it respects _POSIX_THREAD_PROCESS_SHARED. > Hi.. ive been running a pair of WebServices over mod_mono-1.2.4/mono-1.2.3.1 withouth much problems. But problems with threads/semps are known.. It would be very interesting if you could file a detail bug in mono's tracker about _POSIX_THREAD_PROCESS_SHARED to see the reaction over there. Maybe that way, someone do something, and make us all happy... :) cheers!