From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sun Oct 30 19:46:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8F4C27470; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@vangyzen.net) Received: from smtp.vangyzen.net (hotblack.vangyzen.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:7400:216:3eff:fe72:314f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961BB136B; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@vangyzen.net) Received: from imac.home.vangyzen.net (unknown [76.164.15.242]) by smtp.vangyzen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 914405648E; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:46:00 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: svn commit: r306577 - head/sys/netinet To: koobs@FreeBSD.org, Eric van Gyzen , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <201610020142.u921gjsJ016528@repo.freebsd.org> <46cdc5d8-75ee-16f6-ee9d-d9c14cb5098e@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Steven Hartland , Gleb Smirnoff , David Bright From: Eric van Gyzen Message-ID: <89972ae0-2125-1966-4845-38c6a4d20b1e@vangyzen.net> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:45:56 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <46cdc5d8-75ee-16f6-ee9d-d9c14cb5098e@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:46:01 -0000 On 10/30/16 4:44 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 2/10/2016 12:42 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote: >> Author: vangyzen Date: Sun Oct 2 01:42:45 2016 New Revision: 306577 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/306577 >> >> Log: Add GARP retransmit capability > > Thanks for this David & Eric > > I presume this is (or would be) quite complementary to D4111 [1] > (Gratuitous ARP's for lagg(4) failover) when it lands? I'm thinking > particularly given the various states upstream switch ports can have > during topology changes. > > [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4111 Yes, I expect it would be nicely complementary. The disruption of a topology change increases the chance of a dropped packet, so it would be wise to retransmit the GARP sent by lagg(4). Eric