From owner-freebsd-security Thu Feb 26 12:50:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA21362 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 12:50:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA21348 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 12:50:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA26454; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 12:49:50 -0800 (PST) To: tqbf@secnet.com cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenBSD Security Advisory: Source Routing In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:19:07 CST." <19980226201907.6491.qmail@joshua.enteract.com> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 12:49:49 -0800 Message-ID: <26450.888526189@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > advisories, we would like to clarify the matter of Perry Metzger and > his support for OpenBSD. At this time we would like to make it clear > that these comments were meant in jest, as a reaction to a large body > of public commentary by Mr. Metzger regarding OpenBSD. As far as we > know, Mr. Metzger in no way supports the OpenBSD project. I note that this has also been the case for some time, just based on a quick scan of some of the previous advisories - perhaps the jest in question has run its course and can be removed now? It seems to me that it needlessly politicizes what should be (IMHO) a more neutral analysis of security issues. But that's just MHO. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message