From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  1 11:06:50 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85B037B404
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  1 Apr 2003 11:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from analog.databits.net (analog.databits.net [198.78.65.155])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33A2143FBF
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  1 Apr 2003 11:06:49 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from petef@analog.databits.net)
Received: (qmail 32774 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Apr 2003 19:05:53 -0000
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:05:53 -0600
From: Pete Fritchman <petef@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
Message-ID: <20030401190553.GB21045@absolutbsd.org>
References: <200304010821.h318Li4Q091687@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20030401114055.M1612@odysseus.silby.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030401114055.M1612@odysseus.silby.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ping ping.8 ping.c
	src/share/man/man4inet.4 ip.4 src/sys/netinet in.h in_pcb.h ip.h
	ip_input.c ip_output.c ip_var.h src/usr.bin/netstat inet.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 19:06:51 -0000

++ 01/04/03 11:43 -0600 - Mike Silbersack:
| Actually committing to the tree is taking this joke quite a bit too far.
| Is repo-surgery planned to remove this?

Please don't back this out, I'll take this to the TRB if necessary.  At
work, we've already made the appropriate firewall policy changes, and so
far, management is quite impressed.

Also, if I may make a suggestion, the Evil bit should be set to 0x1 by
default - it's the same logic as making a firewall deny everything and
just allow the traffic you want.  We should explicitly have to say we
are _not evil_ when we send packets.

--pete