From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 11 21:37:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DAC16A41F; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08A813C480; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1FF47CA4; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:37:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:37:54 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Alfred Perlstein In-Reply-To: <20070711202640.GV45894@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: <20070711223720.C97304@fledge.watson.org> References: <20070711202640.GV45894@elvis.mu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: current@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bgfsck hosed (lockups) in -current? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:37:55 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I have current as of last week. > > I noticed that if I needed a bgfsck on ufs when rebooting my system would > lock up almost immediately. Everything would deadlock. > > If I rebooted single user and did a regular "fsck -y" then continued to > boot, I'd be OK. > > Has anyone else experienced this? I'm going to update to the most recent > current and get more information (which wait channels etc) but wanted to > know if anyone knew about this. > > I recall seeing a LOT of fixes for various deadlocks in snapshots and bgfsck > going in lately, but nothing that looked to me as if it'd trigger a > regression. I'm not seeing this either -- have you tried running a manual fsck to see if it turns up anything deeply unsatisfying that could be causing bgfsck some bother? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge