From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Dec  6 13:09:47 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA11081
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 13:09:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from suburbia.net (suburbia.net [203.4.184.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA11074
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 13:09:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from proff@localhost)
          by suburbia.net (8.8.3/8.8.2) id IAA04281;
          Sat, 7 Dec 1996 08:07:40 +1100 (EST)
From: Julian Assange <proff@suburbia.net>
Message-Id: <199612062107.IAA04281@suburbia.net>
Subject: Re: mount_mfs
In-Reply-To: <9955.849904535@critter.tfs.com> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Dec 6, 96 09:35:35 pm"
To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 08:07:40 +1100 (EST)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Well, mfs has no real speed advantage over any "real" filesystem since
> we got the share VM/buffer code, so I generally avoid it.
> 
> Remember that it isn't really a mfs but more like a swap-partition-fs.


Erm. What about for writes?