From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jun 12 20:57:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA21328 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 20:57:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from burka.rdy.com (dima@burka.rdy.com [205.149.163.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA21306 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 20:57:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@burka.rdy.com) Received: (from dima@localhost) by burka.rdy.com (8.8.8/RDY&DVV) id UAA06923; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 20:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806130357.UAA06923@burka.rdy.com> Subject: Re: bsd securelevel patch question In-Reply-To: from Jay Richmond at "Jun 12, 98 08:47:20 pm" To: jayrich@room101.sysc.com (Jay Richmond) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 20:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Class: Fast Organization: HackerDome Reply-To: dima@best.net From: dima@best.net (Dima Ruban) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jay Richmond writes: > Hello, > > Just wondering if we should expect an official patch for the securelevel > problem that's affecting all the BSD's, or if the one provided in the > recent exploit is being recommended? According to Thomas Ptacek, this is not exactly a bug, and after thinking some more about it, I kinda agree with him. (Feature, not a bug) > > Thanks, > Jay > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message > -- dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message