From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan 11 14:35:45 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA00774
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 14:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from whyy.org (jehrenkrantz@[199.234.236.254])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA00755
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 14:35:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jehrenkrantz@localhost) by whyy.org (8.6.12/8.6.9) id RAA21220; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 17:36:01 -0500
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 17:36:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Jeff Ehrenkrantz <jehrenkrantz@whyy.org>
To: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
cc: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: pppd vs ijppp
In-Reply-To: <199601102345.SAA00248@etinc.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960111173257.20573A-100000@whyy.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Wed, 10 Jan 1996, dennis wrote:

> 
> And lastly, I think if you took a show of hands on providers and users after
> asking them if they
> would mind using even 50k to get better performance i think that I'd be
> surprised to see even 1
> hand not waving wildly in the air.
> 
> 
Count both of my hands in the air!
..je 'je293' Gloucester County Community FreeNet.