From owner-freebsd-current Sat Nov 28 04:40:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA10508 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 28 Nov 1998 04:40:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au (adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.36.247]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA10502 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 1998 04:40:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au) Received: from bragg (bragg [129.127.36.34]) by adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/UofA-1.5) with SMTP id XAA29355; Sat, 28 Nov 1998 23:10:17 +1030 (CST) Received: from localhost by bragg; (5.65/1.1.8.2/05Aug95-0227PM) id AA31719; Sat, 28 Nov 1998 23:10:16 +1030 Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 23:10:15 +1030 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway X-Sender: kkennawa@bragg To: John Polstra Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Updated gperf? In-Reply-To: <199811272139.NAA07693@vashon.polstra.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 27 Nov 1998, John Polstra wrote: > In article , > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I've been playing around with the egcs snapshots, and newer ones rely on a > > modified version of gperf 2.7 (gperf 2.1 is the version currently in 3.0). > > Can someone who actually understands what gperf does: > > > > 1) pronounce whether 2.7 is suitable for inclusion in the base tree (i.e. > > backwards-compatible for our needs, or whatever), and > > I don't know. I'd suggest trying a make world with the new gperf in > the tree, and seeing what happens. Works fine, as far as I can tell.. > > 2) take a look at > > ftp://egcs.cygnus.com/pub/egcs/infrastructure/gperf-2.7-19981006.pat > > and see whether this is a worthwhile patch to include? > > The patch appears to be incomplete, since it doesn't change any of > the documentation files. That makes it kind of hard to guess what > the patch does. It apparently adds a new command line option. But > what does the new option do? It scratches somebody's secret itch, > apparently. ;-) I've forwarded on the request to the egcs people..hopefully someone will either volunteer to make the doc changes, or explain enough about what the patch does so I can. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message