From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jul 9 5:14:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753C814E23 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 05:14:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA20592; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 08:14:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA18041; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 08:14:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.2/8.6.9) id IAA75654; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 08:14:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 08:14:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199907091214.IAA75654@lakes.dignus.com> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jwd@unx.sas.com Subject: Re: sigaction inconsistancy (here I go again) In-Reply-To: <199907090406.AAA10435@bb01f39.unx.sas.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Also, I haven't gone into the code yet, but the floating point > registers are not saved into the sigcontext so that they can be > inspected and modified as appropriate. > > Thanks, > John If I recall correctly - I think there's a discussion of why this is the case in the -hackers mail archive. - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message