From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 08:20:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2AD16A4CE; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.komquats.com (h24-108-145-252.gv.shawcable.net [24.108.145.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C194043F3F; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:20:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from cwsys.cwsent.com (cwsys [10.1.1.1]) by mail.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D78721F00; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:20:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAPGK5Fk051335; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:20:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Message-Id: <200311251620.hAPGK5Fk051335@cwsys.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Andrew Gallatin , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: Message from "Jacques A. Vidrine" <20031125151939.GB48007@madman.celabo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:20:05 -0800 Sender: Cy.Schubert@komquats.com Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cy Schubert List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:20:09 -0000 In message <20031125151939.GB48007@madman.celabo.org>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" wri tes: > So can we just have a statically linked /bin/sh and get on with life? I was thinking the same thing myself a few days ago. Cheers, -- Cy Schubert http://www.komquats.com/ BC Government . FreeBSD UNIX Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca . cy@FreeBSD.org http://www.gov.bc.ca/ . http://www.FreeBSD.org/