Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:53:30 +0100
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-S=c3=a9bastien_P=c3=a9dron?= <dumbbell@FreeBSD.org>
To:        David Naylor <dbn@freebsd.org>, kwm@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: graphics/s2tc vs graphics/libtxc_dxtn
Message-ID:  <56EF29EA.4040707@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <5788982.TZRZe4S4GE@dragon.local>
References:  <5788982.TZRZe4S4GE@dragon.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 20/03/2016 22:39, David Naylor a écrit :
> Hi,

Hi!

> While addressing a user reported issue with i386-wine-staging I created a port
> based on the GitHub repo https://github.com/divVerent/s2tc to provide the
> libtxc_dxtn library.

If libtxc_dxtn.so gets included in i386-wine*, that's cool! I submitted 
libtxc_dxtn for exactly that purpose but it was never included in Wine 
unfortunately.

> I am in favour of keeping s2tc if we include the tools, otherwise think we
> should drop that port.

I agree only one port is needed and I'm fine with your proposal.

Thank you for doing this!

-- 
Jean-Sébastien Pédron



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56EF29EA.4040707>