From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Nov 13 03:47:08 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA06502
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 03:47:08 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA06489
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 03:47:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from brian@awfulhak.org)
Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA13909;
	Thu, 13 Nov 1997 11:46:16 GMT
	(envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org)
Message-Id: <199711131146.LAA13909@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Feiyi Wang <fwang2@eos.ncsu.edu>
cc: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG,
        brian@awfulhak.org
Subject: Re: Divert Socket Problem 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 Nov 1997 22:00:10 EST."
             <346A6D3A.299F@eos.ncsu.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 11:46:16 +0000
From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I should be damned, now the problem is solved. Archie is right, I forgot
> use htons() to convert the port number. I have a "good reason" of not
> doing that :-), I am refering "natd" source code, and it didn't use
> htons at all, should that be a bug?
[.....]

Natd's being a bit obscure (and a bit wrong).  It does a *htons* 
at argument parsing time.

I've just fixed it so it does a htonl().
-- 
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org>, <brian@FreeBSD.org>, <bri@OpenBSD.org>
      <http://www.Awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....