Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:55:59 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>
To:        Skylar Thompson <skylar@cs.earlham.edu>
Cc:        fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Snapshot problems
Message-ID:  <20050705155011.F87747@duey.wolves.k12.mo.us>
In-Reply-To: <20050705175559.GA70037@quark.cs.earlham.edu>
References:  <20050626182031.GA5268@quark.cs.earlham.edu> <20050701130315.C52686@duey.wolves.k12.mo.us> <42C6C873.8050808@cs.earlham.edu> <86k6k8yxf2.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050705175559.GA70037@quark.cs.earlham.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Skylar Thompson wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:52:01PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
>> Skylar Thompson <skylar@cs.earlham.edu> writes:
>>> No joy. The machine hung again yesterday afternoon, with the error 
>>> "kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded" repeated over and over again on the 
>>> console.
>>
>> So you're using a lot of pipes - more than the kernel can handle 
>> with the default parameters.  What's your workload?  Do you run a 
>> lot of jails?  What is the current value of kern.ipc.maxpipekva? 
>> Have you tried increasing it?
>
> I doubled it from 16 million to 32 million, and the machine still 
> crashes.

Could this just be a side-effect of the filesystem livelocking (I 
guess that is the appropriate term) and a script or other process 
getting out of control as a result?  If so, the "kern.ipc.maxpipekva" 
error would be irrelevant.  I don't recall seeing that error when the 
filesystem livelock happens to me, but I've only actually seen the 
console a few times when it happened, the rest of the times I had to 
power-cycle it remotely.

-- 
  Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us
  FreeBSD: The fastest, most open, and most stable OS on the planet
  - Available for IA32, IA64, AMD64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC architectures
  - PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, and S/390 under development
  - http://www.freebsd.org

Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050705155011.F87747>