From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Nov 30 18:30:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA23491
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 18:30:10 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA23484
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 18:30:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from tom@sdf.com)
Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1)
	id 0xcLTO-0003p0-00; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 18:20:34 -0800
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 18:20:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom <tom@sdf.com>
To: Jim Bryant <jbryant@unix.tfs.net>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 3.0-snap
In-Reply-To: <199711301923.NAA00549@unix.tfs.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971130181833.14686B-100000@misery.sdf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 30 Nov 1997, Jim Bryant wrote:

> is there anything that would keep me from simply cvsupping 3.0-snap
> and compiling locally as opposed to downloading the binary dists and
> boot floppies?
> 
> have any of the filesystems changed to such an extent as to make this
> impossible?

  This really belongs on freebsd-questions

  There is no problem compiling the system yourself, after all that is how
snaps are made.

> jim
> -- 

(insanely long signature removed)

Tom