From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 20:09:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC133106564A for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:09:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from noop.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2001:470:8:162::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9498FC12 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gjp by noop.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.74 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QBukp-000J4i-Pz; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:09:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:09:03 -0400 From: Gary Palmer To: "Vladislav V. Prodan" Message-ID: <20110418200903.GA73035@in-addr.com> References: <4DAC7811.3090407@ukr.net> <4DAC96EA.8080505@ukr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DAC96EA.8080505@ukr.net> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on noop.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Prompt to synchronize two volumes ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:09:05 -0000 On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:54:18PM +0300, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > 18.04.2011 21:12, Artem Belevich wrote: > >This page outlines ZFS replication process fairly well: > >http://wikitech-static.wikimedia.org/articles/z/f/s/Zfs_replication.html > > I do not understand why dumps snapshot to a file and then deploy on a > remote machine? > You can not like something is poured snapshot to another server? > > zfs send -i export/upload@zrep-00001 export/upload@zrep-00002 | ssh > otherservername "cat > /export/save/upload@zrep-00002" > cat /export/save/upload@rzrepl-00002 | zfs recv export/upload > > Maybe there are some pitfalls? Read further down the page. Their reasoning is explained. Regards, Gary