Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:48:21 +0100
From:      Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>
To:        The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx>
Cc:        Jordan K Hubbard <jkh@queasyweasel.com>, libh@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Problem confirmed (?) and death to lib[h]disk (!) (Re: serious libh linking problems)
Message-ID:  <20021114104821.GK94076@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20021113213317.GG9829@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com>
References:  <20021113040224.GB9054@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <69CC05B0-F6BD-11D6-9957-000393BB9222@queasyweasel.com> <20021113042755.GD9054@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <20021113144354.GW94076@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20021113165424.GA9768@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com> <20021113183614.GD94076@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20021113213317.GG9829@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake The Anarcat (anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx):

> Can't you just drop libhdisk from the build? I think it needs to die
> anyways. I doubt anything really depends on it apart from the disk
> editor. If you agree, I'll start getting libh free of libhdisk. We'll
> have to rewrite the disk editor, but I don't see that as a problem at
> all.

I was about to just delete the functions that are no longer supported.
However, I don't know how far we use, for example, the clone() function,
which is also accessible from within TCL.

I #ifdef'ed other functions to return 0 instead on -current, since
e.g. MakeDev() etc aren#t needed on -CURRENT which has devfs.

I'd like to RIP all the RELENG_4 stuff at least, that way we can still
have a more or less working libdisk.

Alex

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021114104821.GK94076>