From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 30 13:08:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA01345 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 13:08:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ravenock.cybercity.dk (ravenock.cybercity.dk [194.16.57.32]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA01323 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 13:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sos@localhost) by ravenock.cybercity.dk (8.8.5/8.7.3) id WAA29422; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 22:09:34 +0100 (MET) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <199701302109.WAA29422@ravenock.cybercity.dk> Subject: Re: ipdivert & masqd In-Reply-To: <19970130211742.TN38393@keltia.freenix.fr> from Ollivier Robert at "Jan 30, 97 09:17:42 pm" To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 22:09:25 +0100 (MET) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Ollivier Robert who wrote: > According to Søren Schmidt: > > and it saves the user for all that proxy fiddleing, they see the > > world as if they where on the net directly... > > ...but make user authentication a nightmare (if it can't be done at all). > In my former job as a security consultant, user identification & > authentication was a big plus of our product. User authentication ?? at the IP level ?? you lost me there :( -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team Even more code to hack -- will it ever end ..