From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 21:49:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255FF37B401 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 21:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linopryne.com (adslh185.cofs.net [207.87.240.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 809E043F3F for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 21:49:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jorge@linopryne.com) Received: (qmail 56596 invoked from network); 29 May 2003 04:50:38 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO linopryne.com) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 29 May 2003 04:50:38 -0000 Received: from 137.52.44.71 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jorge@linopryne.com) by mail.linopryne.com with HTTP; Thu, 29 May 2003 00:50:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4852.137.52.44.71.1054183838.squirrel@mail.linopryne.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 00:50:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jorge Mario G." To: In-Reply-To: <3ED52FFF.3060903@obfuscated.net> References: <3ED52FFF.3060903@obfuscated.net> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.10) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High performance IDS/Firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 04:49:12 -0000 Hi from my personal point of view IPF performs much better than IPFW (I dont know about IPFW2) in stressed situations like the one you are pesenting Jorge