From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 01:01:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33A7106566C for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@mit.edu) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-4.MIT.EDU [18.9.25.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937C28FC1C for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:01:21 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 1209190f-b7f8a6d000000914-d5-4f176b5f7125 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 70.0E.02324.F5B671F4; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:01:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q0J11JiW022196; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:01:19 -0500 Received: from multics.mit.edu (MULTICS.MIT.EDU [18.187.1.73]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q0J11I0X020644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:01:19 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id q0J11Hlu022460; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:01:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:01:17 -0500 (EST) From: Benjamin Kaduk To: Adam Kirchhoff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nopuQLe5vcPCGoMXZn0YWUz/uZHVg 8pjxaT6Lx85Zd9kDmKK4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MtrW/GEuWM9T8b63gbWB8T9nFyMHh4SAicTO Ju4uRk4gU0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAvsYJZb2NkA5Gxgl+m5/Z4RwDjBJ7Dm4kBWkRUiggVHi0cVU EJtFQFviy71H7CA2m4CKxMw3G9lAbBEBfYljxyaC2cwCwhKnL91lBLGFBSwlFn3YCmZzCgRK THu5DqyGV8Be4vrmd4wQ8wMk5j+6AbZLVEBHYvX+KSwQNYISJ2c+YYGYaSlx7s91tgmMgrOQ pGYhSS1gZFrFKJuSW6Wbm5iZU5yarFucnJiXl1qka6KXm1mil5pSuokRFKackvw7GL8dVDrE KMDBqMTDGyki7i/EmlhWXJl7iFGSg0lJlHdjBlCILyk/pTIjsTgjvqg0J7X4EKMEB7OSCO9O E6Acb0piZVVqUT5MSpqDRUmcV03rnZ+QQHpiSWp2ampBahFMVoaDQ0mC93IWUKNgUWp6akVa Zk4JQpqJgxNkOA/Q8D0gNbzFBYm5xZnpEPlTjIpS4ryLQRICIImM0jy4XlgaecUoDvSKMG8H SBUPMAXBdb8CGswENNijSQxkcEkiQkqqgTGLaQ5f+DSXNfF+Ar5sJWdv3Dw23zkp7KGULM/l 5b8nVHSkM0eyT7so0Zxq+r/ae5l2CadJuUr/8x2LIs5XmTWdZdiqfG2qd9DfDT8W3e5un+79 7FW14ndtxx7z7a/XMb7Z+VG0bO3Dpw8nHI1T3ywdxPxBs2lBNvucPWu+hcV0nnouZFupl6fE UpyRaKjFXFScCADuLxOT/gIAAA== Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE Hardware Notes is wrong. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:01:22 -0000 On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Adam Kirchhoff wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/hardware.html > > This section is correct: > > [i386,amd64] The snd_emu10kx(4) driver supports the following sound cards: >> Creative Sound Blaster Live! (EMU10K1 Chipset). Both PCM and MIDI >> interfaces are available. >> Creative Sound Blaster Audigy (CA0100 and CA0101 Chipset). PCM and two >> MIDI interfaces available. >> Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 and Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 4 >> (CA0102 Chipset). PCM support is limited to 48kHz/16 bit stereo (192kHz/24 >> bit part of this chipset is not supported). >> Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Value (CA0108 Chipset). PCM support is >> limited to 48kHz/16 bit stereo (192kHz/24 bit part of this chipset is not >> supported). There is no MIDI support for this card. > > > > This section is wrong: > > > The snd_emu10kx(4) driver does support the following sound cards (although >> they have names similar to some supported ones): >> Creative Sound Blaster Live! 24-Bit, identified by FreeBSD as >> Creative Sound Blaster Audigy LS / ES, identified by FreeBSD as >> All other Creative sound cards with -DAT chipsets. >> All Creative X-Fi series sound cards. > > > > None of those cards are supported by snd_emu10kx (according to the man > page, and in my own personal experience). I believe a "does support" should > read "does not support". Looks like the second one should be "does not support", yes. Thanks for spotting it; hopefully I can prod a committer into making the change. -Ben Kaduk