From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 19:21:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3617237B401 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lightpro1.lightpro.de (lightpro1.lightpro.de [213.133.98.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD4043F3F for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:21:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from h@schmalzbauer.de) Received: from akima (ppp-62-245-162-130.mnet-online.de [62.245.162.130]) (authenticated bits=0)h6G2L5S5030945; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:21:18 +0200 From: "Harald Schmalzbauer" To: "Julian Elischer" Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:21:03 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: escalation stage 2 [was:RE: Big and ugly bug in 5.1-release] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 02:21:27 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > Now after resetting the machine which was hung by "sysinstall" it claims > > that ad4 (one of two mirrored 30GB 2.5" disks" was absent (see > dmesg below) > > mirrored by what? By ata. It is reognized as ar0 after setting it up in the controller's BIOS (in contrast to the DC-133 which needs to be configured with atacontrol for beeing recognized by the kernel with ar0) > > > Now the controller warns me that one drive is bad (which in fact is > > definatley not) and allows me to select "continue boot" > > Th controller is not controlled by FreeBSD. > If the controller says the drive is bad when you are in the BIOS, > Then it is bad. It's not. Like I said I did dozends of test before and whenever it claimd the harddrive to be bad a simple channel change (ad4 got ad6 and vice versa) solved this "error" message. But I also lost data, so this is no option rigth now!!! > > > > That's what I do and after kernel probing the machine reboots with the > > folowing error (well, this takes some time to typewrite it from > my monchrome > > screen): > > If you have another computer nearby, connect the serial cables together > (with a null-modem cable) and put > > console="comconsole" > > in file > /boot/loader.conf > > then your output will occur on the serial port . > then you will not have to type in the information. That'd work if boot2 would detect the serial console or with -h or the "dual flag". I had some experience with FreeBSD kernel and serial console the last fiew weeks (on a Soekris box) but not on a headless system. You see, I'm really in trouble Thank you, -Harry > > > > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > fault virtual address = 0x10 > > fault code= supervisor read, page not present > > instruction pinter= 0x8:0xc014a0a6 > > stack pointer= 0x10:0xcce65bd8 > > frame pointer= 0x10:0xcce65c58 > > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff type 0x1b > > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0 > > current process = 4(g_down) > > trap number = 12 > > panic: page fault > > > > Then it reboots! > > > > Now please give me a hint what to do. This is my brand new > fileserver which > > collected all improtant data from the last decade and since > it's brand new I > > didn't manage any backup. > > When testing the hardware (unplugging one drive while the machine was > > running) I had the same error but I thought that would never > happen under > > normal circumstances. > > > > If sysinstall breakes a RAID1 server 5.1-RELEASE should be immediately > > replaced by a corrected version!!!!! > > FreeBSD 5.1 is a 'testing' release. you are warned not to use it for > production. If you do use it you must know how to upgrade your system > from there to correct bugs that may occur. > > > The message above comes from 'geom' which is the disk > handling code. It has had some work done recently so it may be that the > author (phk@freebsd.org) can help you, but it seens to me that you may > really have a disk problem. > > >