From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 18:18:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E89A37B401 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 18:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (krusty.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9194043FBD for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 18:18:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.1])64FAEA381D for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 03:18:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 3020C7E662; Sat, 10 May 2003 03:18:07 +0200 (CEST) To: "Scott A. Moberly" In-Reply-To: <20030509203926.GA17604@mail.karamazov.org> (Scott A. Moberly's message of "Fri, 9 May 2003 15:39:26 -0500") References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509201306.GA22910@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509203926.GA17604@mail.karamazov.org> From: Matthias Andree Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 03:18:06 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spammers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 01:18:12 -0000 "Scott A. Moberly" writes: > suggestion for display of ports web-side > > s/@/ at /g > > or someother obscure mix??? More obscure please, not something everybody is doing; it won't be long before spammers' web spiders know the reverse trick. If the obfuscation is more diverse yet still human readable, chances are that it's too much work for the spammer and he'll focus on the easy ones. -- Matthias Andree