From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 09:03:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3038516A420 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:03:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F76C43D46 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:03:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 5507 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2006 09:03:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bIvJkK1f7nV7mzTrqdJ+AthU4Hba+qSGRbWgdPUqpWvDPDAEyDROzpLFem3MzMkTN/frn6nJmc40Ru6EgS1nBYNmykok5enDbuk6pA9/KBCbPVeiuaXWcxtpqB+rSiN/UJkywc2O+aTI0sE+Kx0qOJfE14btE/Kfu18C2Z6mKVo= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.30.133.184?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.30.133.184 with plain) by smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jan 2006 09:03:10 -0000 Message-ID: <43D9E1D2.6060207@rogers.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:03:14 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Candler References: <20060125201450.GE25397@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <56988.1138220896@critter.freebsd.dk> <20060126101138.GA40773@uk.tiscali.com> <20060127024432.GT69162@funkthat.com> <20060127085653.GA51554@uk.tiscali.com> In-Reply-To: <20060127085653.GA51554@uk.tiscali.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy , John-Mark Gurney , Poul-Henning Kamp , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:03:14 -0000 Brian Candler wrote: > I guess this is OK, *if* you trust the power management system to do its job > properly. Unfortunately I have very bad experiences of such things. In many > cases I've ended up turning off power management completely and locking > everything at max clock speed. Mind you, if I do that, anything you do with > scaling factors isn't going to affect me, so actually I don't really care. > I'll shut up now :-) > Let's not forget, FreeBSD is really a server OS. Who in their right mind uses power saving features on a server? It sounds nice in theory, but doesn't work as well.