From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jan 28 23:54:57 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C7237B69F
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by earth.backplane.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f0T7sKP61966;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:54:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:54:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <200101290754.f0T7sKP61966@earth.backplane.com>
To: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>,
	"Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch 
References: <20010128101349.2c94539f.steveo@eircom.net> <20010128190227.B25222@spawn.nectar.com>  <200101290453.f0T4roq13148@whizzo.transsys.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

    /etc/shells is such a simple file, I don't see much of point in 
    polluting it.  There is not much of difference having a port install:
    target edit /etc/shells verses editing /usr/local/etc/shells.  It
    should just edit /etc/shells.

						-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message