Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:41:49 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> Cc: Norman Gray <norman.gray@glasgow.ac.uk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The recommended LaTeX port? Message-ID: <20180820114149.2fa42a9f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20180820091205.GA38355@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20180819134150.GA18805@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <20180819161317.9bfdac7f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20180820015337.GA24423@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <8929E48B-15EF-47C7-9F4E-044C0261EA17@glasgow.ac.uk> <20180820091205.GA38355@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:12:06 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Norman Gray wrote: > > [...] > > than I think you'd be best using XeTeX or > > LuaTeX, and restraining yourself from doing anything fancy with fonts. > > Thanks for the insight, Norman! > > Are XeTeX and LuaTeX also in the FreeBSD ports collection? I've just > installed print/texlive-full, are they part thereof? Yes, those are included in the TeXLive default installation, if I remember correctly. Even though they can be used (because they have native Unicode / UTF-8 support), regular LaTeX (in this case, pdflatex, the most common form) can process cyrillic input as explained in my previous message (with example). This is helpful for online services which do not offer access to LuaTeX or xeTeX. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180820114149.2fa42a9f.freebsd>