From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Feb 12 16:10:15 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA04465
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:10:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA04459
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:10:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.4/8.7.3) id QAA16230; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:09:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:09:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199702130009.QAA16230@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: rcarter@consys.com
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199702122331.QAA09207@conceptual.com> (rcarter@consys.com)
Subject: Re: iv-3.1 on 2-2-Gamma
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Even though it claims it's broken, it seems to build and work fine for
 * me after commenting out the BROKEN variable.  My apps are running, at
 * any rate.  Since it gave me a little scare (got a deadline here) when
 * I went about the humdrum process of rebuilding after upgrading to 2.2
 * and g++ 2.7.2.1, maybe the BROKEN message should be changed to something
 * like "Try it, it might work."?

Did it build ibuild?

Satoshi