From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 22:01:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9C316A404 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 22:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE) Received: from mta-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (mta-1.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.7.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C203A13C45E for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 22:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE) Received: from circe ([134.130.3.36]) by mta-1.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JHU002K9IHL3L30@mta-1.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de>; Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from talos.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.3.22]) by circe (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:56 +0200 (MEST) Received: from bigboss.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (bigspace.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.181.2]) by smarthost.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.8/8.13.1/1) with ESMTP id l4AM0tQ6032717; Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:55 +0200 Received: from haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de ([137.226.181.92]) by bigboss.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1HmGhg-00036u-Ej; Fri, 11 May 2007 00:01:40 +0200 Received: by haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 83D2F3F435; Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:55 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer In-reply-to: <20070510134740.GA39021@FreeBSD.czest.pl> To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070510220055.GB1944@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE X-PGP-Key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D References: <20070510134740.GA39021@FreeBSD.czest.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Subject: Re: We don't really need two FTP daemons X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:01:08 -0000 --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 01:47:40PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > Hello, >=20 > There is a lot of confusion caused by the fact of having two instances > of the FTP daemon present in our source tree. >=20 > First one is src/libexed/ftpd/... >=20 > Second one lies in src/contrib/lukemftpd/... >=20 > We don't need to have both of them, unless one has much more powerful > functionality over the second. However, in my opinion the major purpose > of having FTP daemon in the base is possibility of fast configuration > with minimal cost, just to "get it up and running". >=20 Yes, please. From the documentation point of view this is a nightmare. The two servers have similar manpages, partly with the same names, and it's completely non-obvious which belong to whom. One ftpd in base is plenty, thank you. - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGQ5YXbHYXjKDtmC0RAmrmAKDZq1ZrodrB/qkCIG/TAoL+9oOuVgCeNYfu F7Q3kFKvbo2fGrqeXH7jRRk= =K8oe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX--