From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 09:48:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B023106566C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.59.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3878FC1E for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275) id 48EE27300A; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:06:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:06:01 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Gary Jennejohn Message-ID: <20120112100601.GA11325@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <20120112081139.GA9921@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20120112101653.57decd32@ernst.jennejohn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120112101653.57decd32@ernst.jennejohn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel config files outside of sys/${ARCH}/conf ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:48:59 -0000 On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:16:53AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:11:39 +0100 > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > usr/sbin/config assumes that the kernel config file > > lives in ${src_base}/sys/${arch}/conf , which means that > > if you need to build a custom kernel one needs RW > > access to that directory. > > > > Any idea on how we can enable config to work in a > > generic directory ? > > > > I scanned the source code usr.sbin/config and found that > > it uses hardwired paths -- specifically, it looks for > > the kernel source tree in "../.." and has multiple > > hardwired paths such as "../../conf/". > > There is also a somewhat undocumented access to a > > file called DEFAULTS that extends the configuration you pass. > > > > Any objections to the addition of a "-s" option to config(8) > > to specify the location of the source tree ? > > > > Seems like a good idea to me as long as the old behavior is kept. of course :)