From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 2 19:40:06 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA23116 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 19:40:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com (mixcom.mixcom.com [198.137.186.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA23077 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 19:40:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2) id VAA01979; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 21:40:02 -0600 Received: from p75.mixcom.com(198.137.186.25) by mixcom.mixcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma001944; Thu Apr 3 03:39:55 1997 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970402213403.0073b81c@mixcom.com> X-Sender: sysop@mixcom.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 21:34:03 -0600 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Another 2.1.7 upgrade & no bin dist Cc: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 12:39 PM 3/30/97 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >For 2.2.1, I finally just re-wrote all of that attribute code in >frustration at not being able to find the bug (and what I ended up >with was much nicer in the end) and I haven't seen it since. One thing I found usefull was the approximate size of the distribution, which is no longer there. Have to feel sorry for those that don't know "how much" and if the want it all, it could get ugly. Haven't had time to play yet, but looks good. Didn't find more in the packages, but I got less. "Not 'more or less' but 'more *and* less'" please. ;-) Considering some odd problems I have seen with one system out of 2 that were upgraded to 2.1.7, I think I'll start fresh. Don't care to track down the oddities on a production server. Still since you started fresh, I should give the benefit of the doubt. 8-) ------------------------------------------- Jeff Mountin - System/Network Administrator jeff@mixcom.net MIX Communications Serving the Internet since 1990