From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 1 14:49:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA19444 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 14:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA19439 for ; Thu, 1 May 1997 14:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA00450; Thu, 1 May 1997 14:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199705012149.OAA00450@implode.root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Kachun Lee cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kmem_map full with 2.2beta to 2.2-releng-970422 From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 14:49:40 -0700 Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>clients, and our NFS servers have quite a lot of these: >> >> /kernel: nfsd send error 55 >> >>They does not seem cause any ill effect. I assume 55=ENOBUFS No buffer space >>available. But I thought with the unified VM/Buffer, there are no MAXBUFFER >>setting any more. Do you know what parameter I should adjust? > > ...that one indicates that network buffers were depleted. This usually >happens when the interface queue reaches it's limit of 50 queued packets, >although it can also happen if the global pool of network buffers is deleted. ^^^^^^^ Oops, that should have been "depleted". -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project