From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 03:27:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91E816A4CE; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:27:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D2C43D1D; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:27:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1RBR2PG036307; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:27:02 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i1RBR2Sp036302; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:27:02 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:27:00 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: D J Hawkey Jr Message-ID: <20040227112658.GA36271@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , D J Hawkey Jr , kientzle@acm.org, das@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG References: <403CEF67.5040004@kientzle.com> <20040226225149.GB73252@nagual.pp.ru> <403E7B4D.8030803@kientzle.com> <20040227111353.GA14777@sheol.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040227111353.GA14777@sheol.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.24.0.5; VDF 6.24.0.20 (host: pobrecita.freebsd.ru) cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG cc: das@FreeBSD.ORG cc: kientzle@acm.org Subject: Re: Environment Poisoning and login -p X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:27:12 -0000 On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:13:53AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > > Instead, I've decided to follow Jacques Vidrine's > > suggestion of using a whitelist of environment variables > > that are "known-safe." > > Coming in from left field... Will there be some sort of mechanism for > an admin to set/modify this list? I agree we'll need it (because of different assumptions). Something like /etc/safe_environment file. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/