Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:33:03 +0900 (JST) From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: mihnea_capraru@fastmail.fm Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org, openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/103896: OO.o port should add <OO_DIR>/program to LD_LIBRARY_PATH Message-ID: <20061003.173303.32717938.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <200610030655.48573.mihnea_capraru@fastmail.fm> References: <200610021051.k92ApQTL099708@freefall.freebsd.org> <20061003.094837.118629176.chat95@mac.com> <200610030655.48573.mihnea_capraru@fastmail.fm>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Mihnea Capraru <mihnea_capraru@fastmail.fm> Subject: Re: ports/103896: OO.o port should add <OO_DIR>/program to LD_LIBRARY_PATH Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:55:48 +0000 > Right. What I meant is that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not set automatically when > running a UNO application written in Java that needs to bootstrap > OpenOffice.org. Since soffice would only be run at this point (at bootstrap), > the JVM will never even be able to find soffice > in /usr/local/openoffice-***/program, because this entry would only be added > to LD_LIBRARY_PATH by soffice itself (and this is circular). > > This is why I was suggesting to update system-wide LD_LIBRARY_PATH. But if > this is considered too intrusive, then perhaps install a symlink to soffice > in /usr/local/lib (libexec?). First of all adding LD_LIBRARY_PATH is harmful. Such patch (simply adding globally LD_LIBRARY_PATH) will never be integrated. And I think if we use $ORIGIN, such kind of problem will disapper. Currently we are working at this implementation. Hope 6.3 will include this. thanks, -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061003.173303.32717938.chat95>