From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jun 23 22:13:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA24093
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 23 Jun 1996 22:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA24088
          for <freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 1996 22:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.7.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA23739; Sun, 23 Jun 1996 23:13:11 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199606240513.XAA23739@rover.village.org>
To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Subject: Re: When gcc-2.7.2 hits ctm 
Cc: FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 20 Jun 1996 07:55:08 MDT
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 23:13:11 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

: I have a hard time believing that 'most' of the users dont' have direct
: connections.  Some do, some have slow connections to the net.  And some
: with slow connections still don't use CTM. :)

I use ctm because it uses less bandwidth than SUP.  I have a 24x7 33.6
connect, but I still use CTM.

Just a data point...

Warner