From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 27 18:25:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EE716A41C for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:25:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DAE43D49 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:25:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so422690wri for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:25:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=klUd8lhU00B7+Gj9LxKxFK1aHOT+EvbocBzbHQ0Ca9VDpy2aNQrn1zynzf3rVP/eY5dIADquzX5l2nhfqJWSYE07+iBV3yzsMaCCUbmoCkObq+Ew6k38oqcNo7eb9R0alJf2sBjUSxuDaXGAiD3KA0WZe77y0vboLy8swJwbSgQ= Received: by 10.54.49.67 with SMTP id w67mr2588776wrw; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.2 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:25:52 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: Sean Murphy In-Reply-To: <42C03E86.6090509@calarts.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42C03E86.6090509@calarts.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions about packages and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:25:54 -0000 On 6/27/05, Sean Murphy wrote: > I like to use the pkg_add -r feature of FreeBSD, however I have run into > a problem where the ports have a more current version of the app then > the package of the same app. >=20 > It seems the ports collection is updated more then the package > collection is this true? Yes >=20 > Is the maintainer of a package and a port the same person? Are they > responsible for updating the package and the port? Yes and No >=20 > Packages will download dependencys required by the app does the ports do > this as well? Yes --------------- On a similar note can someone remind me how to set the remote package site for pkg_add and portupgrade -P? I remember it had something to do with setenv but don't remember the variable it uses and I've never used the portupgrade -P option before.