From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 23 06:50:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1031065677 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621668FC19 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBN6o680078928 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mBN6o6FO078927; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:50:06 GMT Message-Id: <200812230650.mBN6o6FO078927@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Eygene Ryabinkin Cc: Subject: Re: bin/129764: [patch] unbreak sbin/newfs build for the 8-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eygene Ryabinkin List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:50:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/129764; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eygene Ryabinkin To: Garrett Cooper Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/129764: [patch] unbreak sbin/newfs build for the 8-CURRENT Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:48:40 +0300 --wlFCko3yyTbBmKK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Garret, good day. Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:15:45PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Is this honestly the only area where you had an issue? For now (-CURRENT from Dec 19th) -- yes, it is the only one. > Seems like you should have had more potentially... May be, but I am building the system with some parts disabled, so potential bugs could be unable to transform to the "kinetic" ones ;)) If you have an idea about where another breakages can happen -- I am all ears. > Did you start off with a clean tree (NO_CLEAN=3D0 or unset)? Yes, the tree was clean and the previous tree was never used for builds: it was just the virgin installation of December's snapshot followed by the full CVSup and build. --=20 Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual =20 )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook=20 {_.-``-' {_/ # --wlFCko3yyTbBmKK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklQicgACgkQthUKNsbL7Yj34QCgssTVbFnwTOQyBFdeM1ypmdWs 1q4AoKENmO2yb4ZWYuSBRx0rpdtc1f8D =DO34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wlFCko3yyTbBmKK8--