From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 15 09:34:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA17638 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:34:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA17633 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:34:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA10732; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:34:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Timmons To: HighWind Software Information cc: lists@tar.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Recent 3.0's are Depressing In-Reply-To: <199810151614.MAA25672@highwind.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, you'll have to take what you can get - I'm not a kernel folk nor a more knowledgable folk, but I happen to have a fairly recent -current from yesterday afternoon :) tcsh> time ./condBug 0.008u 0.016s 0:14.48 0.0% 24+496k 0+0io 0pf+0w FreeBSD midtest3.gw.cwu.edu 3.0-BETA FreeBSD 3.0-BETA #0: Wed Oct 14 17:41:50 PDT 1998 (my sources were up-to-date about two hours before the kernel was built. this is also an SMP kernel running on a dual-PII machine.) was it supposed to blow up or something? -Chris On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, HighWind Software Information wrote: > Any of the kernel folks or more knowledgable folks get a chance to try that > program on the latest/greatest kernel + latest/greatest libc_r? > > -Rob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message